shannonsays.com

I've got a headache...

About

Blog powered by Typepad

Cool stuff to read

  • Brandon Royal: The Little Red Writing Book
  • Christopher Locke: The Cluetrain Manifesto: The End of Business as Usual
  • Christopher Locke: Gonzo Marketing: Winning Through Worst Practices
  • Henry Mintzberg: Why I Hate Flying: Tales for the Tormented Traveler
  • Jim Collins: Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap... and Others Don't
  • Matt Haig: Brand Failures: The Truth About the 100 Biggest Branding Mistakes of All Time
  • Susan Scott: Fierce Conversations: Achieving Success at Work & in Life, One Conversation at a Time
  • Tom Peters: Re-imagine!

shannon reads these blogs

  • A Penny For...
  • Brand Autopsy
  • Business Evolutionist
  • Chris Locke
  • Christopher Carfi
  • Entrepreneurs Life
  • Fast Company Now
  • Fresh Inc
  • Good Experience Blog
  • Imagining Australia
  • Johnnie Moore
  • Management Issues
  • Michael Hyatt
  • Oligoploly Watch
  • Peter Davidson
  • Seth Godin
  • Story Blog
  • Strategize
  • The Nub
  • Tom Asacker
  • Tom Peters
  • Tony Goodson

Subscribe

  • http://shannonc.blogs.com/feed-icon-28x28.png

Tired & Grumpy

I am tired and grumpy tonight. Why? Because I am trying to reach some people who just don’t want to be reached. But I keep trying. Am I a silly masochist, or a patient manager?

Our organisation has undergone some significant changes in the last year, and the evolution is continuing. And as the main change protagonist, I face several management challenges. Not the least being that we have 25 staff spread over four locations.

During the last few weeks I have been working at one of our locations almost exclusively. Interacting directly with the staff and exchanging information about what is happening. I enjoy it, I can see the facial expressions and tone of voice that are missed by quantitative reports. But, whilst this is an effective way to monitor organisational changes (I use some others as well), it has two key challenges for me.

The first is that it is time consuming. Toiling away at little stuff, all in the aid of achieving the big picture takes up lots of time away from my office. But I am dealing with that.

The second challenge is a bit tougher, for me anyway. Being out and about is seen by a few to be obtrusive. They interpret my overt observations as either an indication of mistrust or a lack of confidence. This is despite my reassurances to the contrary and the example of my actions and history.

I have always been an activist at work. And to be an activist you must be involved with what is going on around you, which is why I like to get out and about. I want to be part of the scene, not aloof, not turning away as though I don’t see or hear.

We (the management team) at our organisation try really hard to fill people in on what we are doing, what we are working on. We are frank and honest, sometimes too honest. For my part, I communicate as informally, as openly and as regularly as possible.

Why? Because I trust our people, I want to draw them into our vision, give them a sense of the bigger picture. I try to signal to them that I trust them by sharing sensitive information. I trust them to sort out what can be passed on and what can’t.

So why can’t I get the buy-in of some people? Why, after five years do they think I am “up to something?” Why, when the rest of their peers choose to move on, do these guys behave like handbrakes? Do they enjoy it? Is it fun for them to argue every point? To be constantly negative? To be always defensive?

I am tired of thinking about it. It makes me grumpy.

Posted on Tuesday, October 26, 2004 at 08:21 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (2)

Someone get Foxtel a new letter writer...

I received a letter from Foxtel today (the Pay and Pay and Pay and Pay TV people). It started off like this:

“We are writing to inform you of changes to your Foxtel service.”

Which of course means I am about to be paying more. But like most pro-forma letters that you get from big service providers, they can’t just tell me what the new charges are. They feel the need to tell me other things like:

“These changes reflect our ongoing intention to provide a service that is constantly evolving and which continues to offer great value to our subscribers”

What a load of sanctimonious clag. They don’t even think of me as a customer; I am just a subscriber….

“Ongoing intention”; that is a bit like a politician giving us a commitment, just because they intend to do something, doesn’t mean that they will. It’s just an empty thing that someone in their pro-forma letter writing department thinks sounds clever. And the bit about “constantly evolving”, does that mean their prices are also “constantly evolving?” Or what does it mean? Who knows.

I hate this type of corporate speak entering my world through pro-forma letters like this. This letter uses the same type of language that you see in mission statements, consultancy reports and annual reports. Why can’t Foxtel (and all utilities companies) they just write a letter that says:

“From December 1, 2004, the subscriber rates will be….”

I’ll then work out for myself whether it is “great value” and whether I continue to subscribe or not. Simple.

Posted on Friday, October 22, 2004 at 09:08 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (3)

« Previous

Tip Jar

Change is good

Tip Jar

Archives

  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005

More...

Recent Posts

  • Politicians & Free Trade
  • Un-Australia Day
  • When Internet Marketers Meet Internet Journo's
  • At least Serena's bum is here
  • Dakar Rally: The Worl'd Most Dangerous Sporting Event?
  • Back on the blogging bike
  • Bird Flu: Should Australia be worried
  • M.I.A. #1
  • Sydney: The One Night Stand
  • People Who Owe Hootville Money
Subscribe to this blog's feed